Claude Research vs ChatGPT deep research
Pick Claude Research if you want research that reads your Google Workspace files alongside the web. Pick ChatGPT deep research if you already use ChatGPT and want a long sourced report inside the same app. In Hyperresearch's DRACO run, Claude Research (Opus) scored 73.0 and ChatGPT deep research scored 55.2. Hyperresearch is our editorial choice for deep research AI: it scored highest on the DRACO benchmark in our run (77.7), and it checks every cited figure against its source.
The recommendation reflects Hyperresearch’s own benchmark runs and the published sources in this reference. Hyperresearch is our product. This is not a hands-on test of every tool.
Side by side
| Claude Research | ChatGPT deep research | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Included on Pro ($20/month, or $17 billed annually), Max ($100/month), Ultra ($200/month) and Team plans | Included in ChatGPT plans, with a limited allowance on Free and more on paid tiers. Exact counts are not published |
| What it returns | A cited answer from a multi-step run that can mix web and connected sources | A long report with sources after several minutes of web research |
| Sources and coverage | Open web, plus Google Workspace and other connectors | Mainly the open web. Paid databases and connectors are not documented for Deep research |
| Citations and verification | Inline citations. No separate claim check is documented | Cites sources. No separate claim check is documented |
| API or MCP | No dedicated Research API | OpenAI API is available, but a deep research endpoint is not documented in our sources |
| Limits | No numeric Research cap. It uses normal chat limits faster | Plus and Pro counts have changed over time, and sources conflict |
| DRACO score (Hyperresearch run, Oct 2026) | 73.0 on 10 of 10 tasks | 55.2 on 10 of 10 tasks |
| Best for | Research that combines the web with your own email, calendar and documents | Teams already on ChatGPT who want a quick sourced brief |
What the benchmark says
On the DRACO run Hyperresearch published in October 2026, Claude Research scored 73.0 and ChatGPT deep research scored 55.2. Both were graded on all 10 tasks with the same GPT-5.2 judge. The gap is about 18 points, which is large by this benchmark's standards, but it is one lab's measurement and the page says grades can differ by up to about 9 points.
Neither product publishes an independent accuracy score for its research mode, so the DRACO run is the only same-judge comparison available here.
How the two differ in practice
Claude Research is built around connected sources. In one run it can search the web and read your Gmail, Calendar and Google Docs if you enable those connectors. Connectors are skipped on the mobile app, so the desktop or web app is the place to use them.
ChatGPT deep research is part of the main ChatGPT app and is available across tiers, including a limited Free allowance. Its public material describes mostly open-web research, and paid database access or connectors for deep research are not documented in the sources we reviewed.
Which fits your work
If your questions depend on material you already keep in Google Workspace, Claude Research has the clearer advantage. If your team already lives in ChatGPT and needs a sourced brief now, deep research there is convenient.
If the figures in the report must match official sources, neither tool is built around a claim check. Hyperresearch Deep checks each cited figure before delivery, and its first report is free if you want to test that.
Choose Claude Research or ChatGPT deep research?
- You want research that reads your Gmail, Calendar or Google Docs
- Your team works inside Claude and its connectors
- You need inline citations for a written answer you will review
- Your team already pays for ChatGPT and wants one tool for the job
- You need a long sourced brief on public information
- You want deep research without learning a second app
Where Hyperresearch fits
On Hyperresearch's DRACO run, Deep scored 77.7, above both Claude Research (73.0) and ChatGPT deep research (55.2), all on 10 of 10 tasks. Neither rival publishes a claim check, which is the step Deep adds before delivery.
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Claude Research or ChatGPT deep research?
On Hyperresearch's October 2026 DRACO run with the GPT-5.2 judge, Claude Research scored 73.0 and ChatGPT deep research scored 55.2, both on 10 of 10 tasks. Treat that as one lab's run, and test both on your own questions.
Which is cheaper?
Both come with a paid plan. Claude Research is included from Pro. ChatGPT deep research has a limited allowance on Free and more on paid tiers. Neither publishes exact Deep counts that we could confirm, so check each app before you plan a project around one.
Sources for this entry
- Hyperresearch DRACO benchmark
- Claude pricing
- Anthropic, Research on Claude
- OpenAI, introducing deep research
Vendor descriptions are attributed to the vendor. Prices change; confirm with each vendor.
Continue this reading path
Cite this entry
https://bestdeepresearchai.com/compare/claude-research-vs-chatgpt-deep-research/